What may come as a surprise are the mixed results Digital Foundry reported for the console versions. The best looking and best playing version of Battlefront II is found on a high-performance PC.
#Star wars battlefront 2 pc 1080p#
However, creating a high-quality 1080p graphics mode involves increased development time that developers may not be able to afford. Middle-Earth: Shadow of War and Rise of the Tomb Raider have chosen the dual-mode option and produced showcase games for the One X. Having a choice would benefit all players, especially those who sit too far from their 4K TVs to see all of the detail in a 2160p image. Let players choose whether they prefer dynamically scaled 2160p with reduced graphics or enhanced graphics running at 1080p. The One X isn’t powerful enough to do both, and EA Dice chose to emphasize resolution over graphics.ĭice’s decision is reasonable, but why not give players the option to choose between resolution and graphics quality modes? The One X has the power to produce higher quality graphics while running the game at 1080p.
#Star wars battlefront 2 pc Pc#
The PC locks on 2160p resolution while maintaining a clear advantage over the One X in terms of graphics quality.
Watching as an opportunity disappears Credit: EA Star Wars/YouTubeĭigital Foundry brings up an issue that I wish more developers would consider. The tech analyst at Digital Foundry reported that the stuttering, while noticeable, did not materially affect gameplay. The One X drops frames more frequently and visibly stutters at times. The findings were similar to what they observed during the campaign. In many cases, the dips in frame rate are unnoticeable, and when the One X stutters a bit, it passes quickly.ĭigital Foundry also examined performance during the Galactic Assault multiplayer mode. Both consoles drop a few frames now and again, but the One X does it more often.
#Star wars battlefront 2 pc pro#
The performance differences between the One X and the Pro are persistent during the single-player campaign. The differences are small, but the Pro sticks to the targeted 60 fps frame rate more often than the One X. The result is a richer visual environment with less pop-up as you move through the world.īattlefront II looks better on the One X than the Pro but the tables are turned when it comes to performance. The PC also puts more objects on the ground than the One X and increases draw distances. Shadow quality is particularly striking as shadows cast by individual leaves and branches are visible on the PC. All of the advantages the One X has over the Pro are improved even more on PC. The PC really shines when it comes to graphics quality. Texture filtering also favors the One X because it interacts with resolution to produce a clearer image when textures are viewed at an angle or at distance. In some cases, the One X uses higher resolution textures giving surfaces a more detailed and refined look. Bloom is reduced on the One X producing more realistic looking flaming debris. Shadow quality and ambient occlusion are both tuned up on the One X and reflections on shiny surfaces appear less pixelated than they do on the Pro. Graphics quality is better on the One X than the Pro although the differences are not as striking as they are with resolution. Graphics quality comparison between the Xbox One X on the left and a high-performance PC on the.
0 kommentar(er)
